Agency Agreements: The Deal Behind the Deal
Dr Lee Konowe breaks down why an agency agreement is more than admin — it’s the lawful working relationship that defines authority, responsibilities, risk, and timing in real estate. The episode also unpacks the six core principles behind these agreements and the everyday mistakes agents make when they rush the paperwork.
Is this your podcast and want to remove this banner? Click here.
Chapter 1
The agreement isn’t paperwork — it’s the deal
Denese Konowe
[warmly] Welcome to the show. Dr Lee Konowe, I want to start with a moment every agent knows: you’ve had the lounge chat, you’ve walked the property, everybody’s nodding, and then that agency agreement comes out. That is the moment the whole thing changes. It stops being a nice real estate conversation and becomes a lawful working relationship.
Dr Lee Konowe
[curious] That phrase you used -- “lawful working relationship” -- that’s the hinge, isn’t it? Because a lot of people hear “agency agreement” and think clipboard, signatures, admin. But what you’re really saying is the document creates authority. It tells the agent what they may do, what the client expects, and where the risk sits if things go wrong.
Denese Konowe
Exactly. And after 25 years in real estate, across a few continents, I can tell you this is where experienced agents slow down and newer agents often speed up. They think, “I know these owners, we’ve already discussed it, let’s get the form signed and move on.” No. The agreement is not the tail end of the conversation. It IS the deal.
Dr Lee Konowe
[deadpan] Which is awkward for people who treat it like the parsley on the plate. Decorative. Technically present. Nobody respecting it.
Denese Konowe
[laughs] Yes! And parsley is harmless. A sloppy agency agreement is not. It defines who the client is, what services are being provided, how long the relationship lasts, and what the commercial arrangement is. If any of that is fuzzy, you’ve built your whole transaction on fog.
Dr Lee Konowe
“Built it on fog” is memorable. And from a psychology angle, people routinely assume shared understanding when there isn’t any. One party thinks, “You’re selling my home.” The other thinks, “I’m authorised to market under these terms until this date.” Those are not the same thought, even if both people feel positive in the moment.
Denese Konowe
Right. Feelings are not compliance. Good intentions are not clarity. And this matters because agency work in New Zealand sits inside real legal obligations. If the agreement is weak, the client may not be protected properly, and the agent may be exposed in ways that were completely preventable.
Dr Lee Konowe
[skeptical] Let me push that a bit. When you say “preventable,” do you mean dramatic disputes, tribunal-level trouble, that sort of thing? Or the everyday, almost boring mistakes?
Denese Konowe
Mostly the boring mistakes, and those are the dangerous ones. Rushed signatures. Missing details. Assumptions that “everyone understands.” Starting work before everything is properly settled in writing. Those little shortcuts feel efficient at 4:30 on a Friday and very expensive later.
Dr Lee Konowe
That 4:30 Friday image... yeah, every profession has its version of that. The tired brain starts saying, “Close enough.”
Denese Konowe
And close enough is not the standard. So today we’re keeping this practical: what the agreement actually does, the six core principles underneath it, what needs to be in writing, where agents get caught out, and the simple habits that keep you compliant while protecting your client.
Dr Lee Konowe
[matter-of-fact] So not law lecture, not scare tactics -- just the agent’s field guide. How to set up the relationship properly so you can actually do the work without guessing what you’re allowed to do.
Denese Konowe
That’s it. If an agent takes one thing from this episode, I want it to be this: the agency agreement is not what happens after trust is built. It is one of the ways trust is built.
Chapter 2
What an agency agreement actually does
Dr Lee Konowe
[calm] Alright, let’s pin down the mechanics. In plain language, the agency relationship begins when the client signs the agency agreement. Not when they say, “Yep, sounds good.” Not when they text, “Go ahead.” The signed agreement is the starting line.
Denese Konowe
And that timing matters. Because once it’s signed, everybody should know we now have a defined relationship. Usually that relationship ends when the property sells or when the agreement expires. Again, practical point -- there needs to be an end point, not some vague sense that you’re “still kind of working on it.”
Dr Lee Konowe
That phrase “still kind of working on it” is exactly how trouble sneaks in. If the agreement starts on signature and usually ends on sale or expiry, then agents need to know which of those two clocks they’re dealing with at all times.
Denese Konowe
Yes. And also, agency work is broader than many people casually say. We often hear agents talk as though this is only about listing a house for sale. It’s not that narrow. Real estate agency work involves services related to buying, selling, and leasing properties.
Dr Lee Konowe
Buying, selling, and leasing -- those three words matter. Because if a listener mentally files agency agreements under “seller listing paperwork,” they’re already missing part of the picture.
Denese Konowe
Absolutely. The agreement is the record of who is doing what, for whom, and on what terms. That’s the plain-English version. Who is the client? What service is the agent providing? What are the expectations? What is the commercial arrangement? How long does this apply?
Dr Lee Konowe
[questioning tone] Let me try to explain it back. It’s basically the operating manual for the relationship.
Denese Konowe
Almost. More than a manual. A manual tells you how to use something. This tells you what has actually been agreed. That difference is huge. If it’s not recorded clearly, people start filling gaps with memory, hope, or convenience.
Dr Lee Konowe
Memory, hope, or convenience -- that’s a dangerous trio. [chuckles] And memory is especially unreliable. Two people can leave the same meeting with two different versions of what was “obvious.”
Denese Konowe
That’s why the written agreement matters so much. It anchors the relationship. If the client later asks, “What exactly were you authorised to do?” or the agent thinks, “I understood we had agreed on these terms,” the answer shouldn’t depend on who sounds more confident. It should be in the agreement.
Dr Lee Konowe
And for agents, that record also reduces that low-grade anxiety. You know the one -- the mental static of “Did we actually cover that?”
Denese Konowe
Yes, and professionalism loves certainty. Good agents are not just good at rapport; they’re good at defining the working relationship cleanly from day one. That protects the client, and it protects the agent’s ability to perform the service without confusion.
Dr Lee Konowe
[reflective] So the agreement doesn’t get in the way of the real work. It’s the thing that lets the real work happen on solid ground.
Denese Konowe
Perfectly put. When it’s done right, everybody knows where they stand. And once people know where they stand, the transaction tends to run a whole lot smoother.
Chapter 3
The six core principles, decoded for agents
Denese Konowe
[energised] Let’s decode the six principles behind agency agreements, because agents hear these words and sometimes switch off. Don’t. In plain language, these are the bones holding the whole thing up: mutual consent, legality, capacity, consideration, certainty, and intent.
Dr Lee Konowe
Six is manageable. Let’s go one at a time. Start with mutual consent, because that sounds simple and often isn’t.
Denese Konowe
Exactly. Mutual consent means both parties genuinely agree to the terms. Not “we sort of skimmed it.” Not “they signed where I pointed.” Genuine agreement. If the client doesn’t really understand what they’re signing, don’t kid yourself that a signature magically fixes that.
Dr Lee Konowe
That “signed where I pointed” line will stick with me. Because psychologically, people often comply in the room. They don’t want to look awkward, don’t want to slow things down, and they assume they’ll sort it out later. That is NOT the same as informed agreement.
Denese Konowe
Right. Then legality. The agreement must comply with New Zealand law to be enforceable. Agents don’t need to become courtroom philosophers, but they do need to understand this: if your agreement doesn’t line up with the law, calling it an agreement won’t save it.
Dr Lee Konowe
[matter-of-fact] “Enforceable” is the key word there. A document can exist physically and still fail in the moment it’s tested.
Denese Konowe
Then capacity. Both parties must have the legal ability to enter the contract. Sounds obvious, but agents can get sloppy here by assuming the person in front of them automatically has the authority and capacity to contract. Assumptions are expensive.
Dr Lee Konowe
And “the person in front of them” is a useful way to say it. Presence is not proof. Just because someone is sitting at the table doesn’t answer whether they can legally commit to the agreement.
Denese Konowe
Exactly. Next is consideration. That’s the value exchanged in the deal, often commission for the agent. There has to be some value moving between the parties. This is one reason the commercial terms can’t be hand-wavy.
Dr Lee Konowe
“Often commission” grounds it nicely. The listener can picture that immediately: services on one side, payment on the other.
Denese Konowe
Then certainty. Contracts must be clear and specific about what is being agreed. This is where agents get caught out constantly: vague terms, generic wording, little phrases that everybody nods at because they sound normal. If the terms aren’t clear, certainty is weak.
Dr Lee Konowe
[sharp] I think certainty may be the sleeper issue here. Because “vague terms” sounds harmless until you realise vagueness is just delayed conflict. It’s an argument with a timer on it.
Denese Konowe
That is beautifully said. And finally, intent. Both parties must genuinely intend to enter the agreement. This is a real commitment, not a pretend placeholder until somebody decides what they really meant later.
Dr Lee Konowe
So if I bundle those six together: genuine agreement, lawful agreement, capable parties, value exchanged, clear terms, real intent. That’s the structure.
Denese Konowe
Yes, and for agents the practical traps are very ordinary: rushing the signature, leaving terms vague, and assuming “everyone understands.” Experienced agents don’t rely on atmosphere. They rely on clarity.
Dr Lee Konowe
[softly] Atmosphere is not evidence. There’s the fridge magnet.
Chapter 4
What must be in writing — and why oral shortcuts backfire
Dr Lee Konowe
[skeptical] Let’s talk about the temptation. An agent has a good conversation, everyone’s comfortable, and somebody says, “No worries, we’ve talked it through.” That is exactly when oral shortcuts start looking attractive.
Denese Konowe
And that’s exactly when discipline matters. Having a written agency agreement is crucial for clarity and protection. Crucial. Not nice to have. Not best practice if you have time. It creates a clear record of the relationship and the terms attached to it.
Dr Lee Konowe
“Clarity and protection” -- two words, very practical. Clarity for the day-to-day, protection when memory gets selective.
Denese Konowe
Yes. In writing, the agreement needs to clearly record the scope of work, the expectations, and the commercial terms tied to the relationship. In other words: what are you doing, what is the client expecting, and what are the agreed business terms around that work?
Dr Lee Konowe
Scope, expectations, commercial terms. That triad is memorable. If any one of those three is fuzzy, the whole arrangement gets unstable.
Denese Konowe
Exactly. And oral shortcuts backfire because spoken understandings are fragile. People hear what they expect to hear. They remember the parts that suit them. They forget the bits that were only mentioned quickly. A proper written agreement takes that wobble out of the relationship.
Dr Lee Konowe
[curious] Give me the most common shortcut you’ve seen agents take.
Denese Konowe
Starting work before the paperwork is complete. That one is incredibly common. The agent thinks, “I’ll sort the details after I get moving.” But if the agreement is what establishes the working relationship, then doing the work first and tidying the agreement later is backwards.
Dr Lee Konowe
Backwards is the exact word. It’s like taking off in the plane and saying you’ll file the flight plan after landing. [dryly] As one-time pilot-adjacent me would prefer... not ideal.
Denese Konowe
[laughs] Not ideal at all. Another mistake is relying on verbal understandings. “We said that on the phone.” “We discussed that at the appraisal.” Maybe you did. But if it isn’t clearly recorded, you’re now trusting recollection instead of documentation.
Dr Lee Konowe
And recollection degrades fast. Not in six years -- in days. Sometimes in the car ride home.
Denese Konowe
Then there’s generic language. Agents use wording so broad it doesn’t actually clarify anything. They think they’re being efficient, but generic language creates ambiguity, and ambiguity is the enemy of certainty.
Dr Lee Konowe
“Generic language creates ambiguity” is another one worth remembering. Because vague wording can feel professional. It looks official. It just doesn’t do enough work.
Denese Konowe
That’s right. A written agreement should leave less room for guessing, not more. If you ever find yourself saying, “Well, we all knew what we meant,” stop. That sentence is usually the warning light on the dashboard.
Dr Lee Konowe
[reflective] Which means writing isn’t bureaucracy here. Writing is how you make the agreement real, testable, and fair to both sides.
Chapter 5
Common mistakes agents make when setting up agency agreements
Denese Konowe
[practical] Let’s get very field-level now. Where do agents actually stumble? Incomplete forms. Unclear expiry terms. Missing signatures. And one that gets underestimated all the time: not checking whether the client truly understands the agreement.
Dr Lee Konowe
That list is painfully ordinary, which is why it matters. Incomplete forms and missing signatures don’t sound dramatic -- until they become the whole issue.
Denese Konowe
Exactly. A lot of compliance problems aren’t born from bad motives. They come from rushing. The conversation feels fine, the relationship feels friendly, the agent wants momentum, and suddenly details are left half-done. But half-done paperwork creates full-sized problems.
Dr Lee Konowe
“Half-done paperwork creates full-sized problems.” That one has teeth. And unclear expiry terms are especially interesting to me, because time is one of those things people assume is obvious. It usually isn’t.
Denese Konowe
Quite right. If the agreement usually ends when the property is sold or the agreement expires, then expiry has to be clear. Not implied. Not “we’ll know it when we get there.” Clear. Agents should be able to point to it and clients should be able to understand it.
Dr Lee Konowe
[questioning tone] What about changes? Because this feels like another danger zone. Everybody signs, then something shifts, and the room says, “No problem, we’ve agreed to the update.”
Denese Konowe
Yes -- and that’s where failure to document changes properly bites. If the relationship changes, the record needs to reflect that. Otherwise the paperwork says one thing while the people think another. That gap is where compliance trouble loves to live.
Dr Lee Konowe
Paperwork says one thing, people think another. That’s almost the definition of avoidable conflict.
Denese Konowe
It is. So here’s the practical angle I’d use before leaving the table or sending paperwork. I would double-check that the agreement is complete, that the terms are clear, that the expiry is obvious, that all needed signatures are there, and that the client has actually understood what they are entering into.
Dr Lee Konowe
[counts off lightly] Complete. Clear. Expiry obvious. Signatures there. Understanding confirmed. Five checks before you walk away.
Denese Konowe
Yes, and I’d add one mindset piece: do not confuse silence with understanding. Some clients are quiet because they’re comfortable. Some are quiet because they’re lost. The agent’s job is to know which is which.
Dr Lee Konowe
That is such an important distinction. Silence can mean agreement... or embarrassment... or overload. Same outward behaviour, three different realities.
Denese Konowe
Which is why good agents don’t just present the agreement. They work through it. They create room for questions. They listen for hesitation. They make sure the document and the human understanding match.
Dr Lee Konowe
[soft chuckle] So the experienced agent’s superpower isn’t speed. It’s catching the tiny mismatch before it turns into a very expensive, very official mismatch later.
Chapter 6
Protecting yourself and your clients while staying compliant
Dr Lee Konowe
[calm] The nice thing about good agency agreement practice is that it’s not only defensive. Yes, it helps avoid trouble. But it also creates a cleaner, calmer working relationship from day one.
Denese Konowe
Absolutely. Good practice protects both sides. The client gets clear expectations about what the agent is doing and on what terms. The agent gets a solid, documented foundation for the work. That is not red tape -- that is professional structure.
Dr Lee Konowe
And the safeguards here are wonderfully unglamorous. Use plain language. Confirm understanding. Keep records. Check the agreement against current legal requirements. None of that is flashy. All of it is useful.
Denese Konowe
[warmly] Plain language is a big one for me. If an agent can’t explain the agreement in ordinary English, there’s a problem. Clients should not need a decoder ring. The clearer the language, the stronger the trust and the lower the risk of misunderstanding.
Dr Lee Konowe
“Decoder ring” is good. Because jargon can create fake confidence. Everyone nods because the words sound official, while actual understanding quietly leaves the room.
Denese Konowe
Yes, and confirming understanding means more than asking, “Any questions?” Sometimes people say no because they don’t know what to ask. Better to check in a way that actually tests clarity: make sure both sides genuinely understand the terms they are entering.
Dr Lee Konowe
That’s subtle but huge. “Any questions?” often produces politeness. Real confirmation produces information.
Denese Konowe
Then keep records. Good records support clarity, consistency, and accountability. If something needs to be checked later, you want the written trail to help you, not haunt you.
Dr Lee Konowe
[dryly] “Help you, not haunt you” -- every administrator in New Zealand just nodded.
Denese Konowe
[laughs] Quite. And finally, check the agreement against current legal requirements. Because compliance is not a vibe. It is not “I’ve done it this way for years.” It needs to line up with what is required now.
Dr Lee Konowe
That phrase “done it this way for years” can be dangerous in any profession. Experience is valuable, but only if it stays current.
Denese Konowe
Exactly. And this is the takeaway I want agents to sit with: compliance isn’t just about avoiding trouble. It’s about professionalism, trust, and better client outcomes. When the agreement is clear, lawful, and properly understood, people can move forward with confidence.
Dr Lee Konowe
[reflective] Which means the agency agreement is really a test of intent. Are we just trying to get the signature and move on, or are we trying to build a relationship that can carry pressure when the transaction gets stressful?
Denese Konowe
That’s the real question. Because transactions always get a bit stressful somewhere. The agents who handle that best are usually the ones who got the foundation right before the stress arrived.
Dr Lee Konowe
[softly] Get the foundation right before the stress arrives. That’s a good place to leave it.
Denese Konowe
Thanks for joining us.
Dr Lee Konowe
See you next time.
